Current:Home > NewsMaryland Supreme Court hears arguments on child sex abuse lawsuits -Wealth Empowerment Zone
Maryland Supreme Court hears arguments on child sex abuse lawsuits
View
Date:2025-04-24 12:45:32
ANNAPOLIS, Md. (AP) — The Supreme Court of Maryland heard arguments on Tuesday about the constitutionality of a 2023 law that ended the state’s statute of limitations for child sexual abuse lawsuits following a report that exposed widespread wrongdoing within the Archdiocese of Baltimore.
The arguments, which lasted several hours and often veered into highly technical legalese, largely focused on the intent of the Maryland legislature when it passed a preceding law in 2017 that said people in Maryland who were sexually abused as children could bring lawsuits up until they turned 38.
A ruling from the state’s highest court is expected in the coming months.
Gov. Wes Moore, a Democrat, signed the Child Victims Act into law last year — less than a week after the state’s attorney general released a report that documented rampant abuse committed by Baltimore clergy spanning 80 years and accused church leaders of decades of coverups.
The report, which is nearly 500 pages, included details about more than 150 Catholic priests and others associated with the Archdiocese of Baltimore abusing over 600 children. State investigators began their work in 2019. They reviewed over 100,000 pages of documents dating back to the 1940s and interviewed hundreds of victims and witnesses.
Days before the new law was to take effect Oct. 1, the archdiocese filed for bankruptcy to protect its assets ahead of an anticipated deluge of litigation. That means claims filed against the archdiocese will be relegated to bankruptcy court, but other institutions such as Catholic schools and individual parishes can still be sued directly.
All lawsuits filed under the Child Victims Act have been placed on hold pending a decision from the Maryland Supreme Court. Lawmakers had anticipated such a challenge on constitutional grounds and included a provision in the law outlining that process.
While the court’s ruling will have wide-reaching effects for child sex abuse cases in Maryland, the oral arguments Tuesday centered on a seemingly small technical issue involving the earlier 2017 law change that established the cutoff at age 38.
The question at hand is whether a provision in the 2017 legislation was written in such a way that permanently protected certain defendants from liability. Answering that question likely requires the court to decide whether the provision should be considered a statute of limitations or a so-called statute of repose.
Attorneys for defendants facing liability claims under the new law contend it’s a statute of repose, which they say can’t be modified because it includes a “vested right to be free from liability.”
“As a general matter, of course, a legislature may repeal existing laws and substitute new ones. But it may not do so in a manner that destroys substantive rights that have vested under the terms of existing law,” the Archdiocese of Washington wrote in a brief filed ahead of oral arguments.
Attorneys representing businesses, insurance companies and Maryland civil defense lawyers also raised concerns in a supporting brief about issues surrounding witness testimony and record retention in cases being filed decades after the fact.
But the most substantive arguments before the court Tuesday focused on legislative intent.
Attorneys for abuse survivors asserted that when the Maryland General Assembly passed the 2017 law, legislators clearly did not intend to prevent future lawmakers from reconsidering the issue and altering the time limits on civil lawsuits. The law may have included the term “repose,” but that doesn’t mean the legislature wanted to make it permanent, attorneys argued.
“There is a debate between that label — statute of repose — and the actual operational function of the act,” attorney Catherine Stetson told the court’s seven justices, arguing that the court should consider the statute’s structure, operation and full text rather than looking at “a word in a vacuum.”
“Child sexual abuse is a scourge on society, and it often takes survivors decades to come to terms with what they suffered,” victims’ attorneys wrote in a brief. “It is hard to imagine a law more rationally related to a legitimate governmental interest than this one.”
Some justices expressed skepticism about whether state legislators in 2017 knowingly chose language with the intention of limiting the powers of their successors.
“If it had that significance, wouldn’t you expect that there would be more explanation in the legislative record?” Chief Justice Matthew Fader asked. “Wouldn’t that have popped up somewhere?”
Attorneys for the Archdiocese of Washington and the Key School, a small private school in Annapolis, asserted that the legislature was clear and unambiguous in its language.
“The General Assembly meant exactly what it said,” attorney Sean Gugerty told the court. “The plain language of the statute is what controls the analysis.”
Justice Brynja Booth pointed out that interpreting the law isn’t always cut and dry.
“Don’t we often look beyond a label ... to look at the characteristics to determine what it actually means,” she said.
veryGood! (8)
Related
- What polling shows about Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, Harris’ new running mate
- Strictly Come Dancing Alum Robin Windsor Dead at 44
- What we know about the Minnesota shooting that killed 2 officers and a firefighter
- One thing jumps off the page about Chargers coach Jim Harbaugh's staff: great familiarity
- Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time
- Judge to set prison sentences for YouTube mom Ruby Franke and business partner in child abuse case
- Elon Musk says first Neuralink patient can control a computer mouse with thoughts
- Gwen Stefani and Gavin Rossdale's Son Apollo Is All Grown Up at Disco-Themed 10th Birthday Party
- Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
- Georgia state trooper dies after being struck by vehicle while investigating crash
Ranking
- USA women's basketball live updates at Olympics: Start time vs Nigeria, how to watch
- Can Lionel Messi and Inter Miami be MLS Cup champions? 2024 MLS season preview
- Los Angeles is making it easier to find an EV charger. Here's their plan for closing the charging gap.
- The Hoosier Gym, home of the Hickory Huskers, still resonates with basketball fans
- Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie return for an 'Encore,' reminisce about 'The Simple Life'
- Book excerpt: Come and Get It by Kiley Reid
- Defense: Suspended judge didn’t shoot estranged boyfriend, is innocent of attempted murder, assault
- The Supreme Court leaves in place the admissions plan at an elite Virginia public high school
Recommendation
Bet365 ordered to refund $519K to customers who it paid less than they were entitled on sports bets
When a morning headache is more than just a headache (and when a doctor's visit may be in order)
Jason and Travis Kelce Address Kansas City Super Bowl Parade Shooting
Lionel Messi on false reports: Injury, not political reasons kept him out Hong Kong match
NHL in ASL returns, delivering American Sign Language analysis for Deaf community at Winter Classic
Giants' top exec jokes that relentless self-promotion helped fuel Pablo Sandoval's return
Iowa's Caitlin Clark sets sights on Pete Maravich with next game vs. Indiana
When is Opening Day? What to know about 2024 MLB season start date, matchups